IS COVID REALLY OVER IN CALIFORNIA? NOT QUITE YET

 

CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2023, OR THEREAFTER

BY THOMAS D. ELIAS

“IS COVID REALLY OVER IN CALIFORNIA? NOT QUITE YET”

 

The assumption everywhere in America, especially in California, is that the coronavirus pandemic is over.

 

But as the old Walt Disney tune has long reminded us about presumptions: “It ain’t necessarily so.”

 

Go to any gym that was closed for a year or more at the height of the pandemic, where masking was required for many months after reopening, and it’s rare to see even one person in a protective mask.

 

Visit most restaurants, and far more diners are enjoying meals indoors than outside, as became the vogue when the pandemic began to ease a bit in 2021.

 

Go to a ballpark and try to find anyone in a mask. In fact, hospitals and other health care facilities are about the only places where masking is taken seriously. Even there, workers, patients and visitors all are about as concerned today about other diseases as over COVID-19.

 

        But what if the virus mutates again, for the seemingly umpteenth time, and takes a more threatening form than the last few iterations? In reality, new spinoffs of the Omicron variant appear about monthly in California, but so far existing vaccines and medications are handling them and hospitalization rates remain low.

 

        At the height of the pandemic, the state’s Public Health department and the health department of Los Angeles County, largest civic entity in the nation below the state level, often operated in tandem. What one decreed, the other followed, often on the same day.

 

        That’s why a new Covid response plan issued by that county probably gives a good idea of what might happen if public presumptions prove wrong and there’s a return to crowded Covid wards in hospitals and frenzied, sudden rule-making by public authorities. The basics of that plan: deploy boosters and other drugs.

 

        For one thing, even though they have all but disappeared from daily newspaper and television updates, both the state and county still keep careful and detailed statistics on Covid occurrence. A sudden spike would cause new edicts.

 

        But there is no sign any such dictates are imminent. For one thing, Los Angeles County sets levels of Covid incidence ranging from low hospital admissions (less than 10 cases per 100,000 population) to high admissions (more than 20 per 100,000). When the county issued its last update, there were still distinct COVID-19 treatment sections in some large hospitals, but not in most small to medium-sized ones.

 

        But the actual admission rate was running near three cases per 100,000 population – ultra low.

 

        This can be ascribed both to effectiveness of the new bivalent booster shots of the vaccines readily available to people over 60, which cover both original Covid and the pernicious Omicron, and the fact that the newest viral variations are not as harmful or deadly as the original or its early mutations.

 

        Out of hospital treatments also are now widely available, especially the oral Pfizer drug Paxlovid, which quickly eliminates symptoms in many patients. Without serious symptoms, hospitalization is generally unneeded.

 

        But state and local health authorities warn against growing lax in wariness of Covid.

 

        “Treatments (like Paxlovid) can prevent you from getting very sick,” trumpets a bulletin from Los Angeles County. “They have been proven to significantly reduce the risk of death or hospitalization from COVID-19.”

 

        But the state warns against letting people’s guard down completely and becoming complacent. “Treatment must be started early,” they note. “The oral medicines must be started within five days of when symptoms begin. Do not wait for symptoms to get worse.”

 

        Meanwhile, prescriptions are needed for the oral drugs, but booster shots can be had for the asking. And the health agencies point out citizenship and insurance status are not now factors in either drug or booster availability.

 

        That’s not very different from what’s available to deal with the flu and some other common ailments.

 

        One thing not mentioned anywhere any more: Closing schools or businesses. Those were the most controversial and politically contentious elements among the early methods of trying to contain Covid.

 

        All of which suggests that medical and pharmaceutical advances have created a situation like anti-vaccination activists always wish for: Treatments and preventives are available to anyone who wants them, but no one will compel compliance, even though vaccine and drug effectiveness becomes more obvious every day.

 

            -30-

    Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net

ETHNIC STUDIES PLAN: CLOSER, BUT STILL NO CIGAR

CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, AUGUST 28, 2020, OR THEREAFTER


BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
   “ETHNIC STUDIES PLAN: CLOSER, BUT STILL NO CIGAR”

          The ethnic studies curriculum now entering a public comment period before its scheduled adoption by the state Board of Education next spring is improved from last year’s rejected abomination, but remains a far cry from what it should be.

          In short, closer but still no cigar.

          The major improvement is that the new proposed curriculum this time recommends teaching about more forms of historic prejudice than the prior version, sent back to the drawing board almost exactly a year ago because it omitted so much.

          For example, the world’s oldest form of bigotry, anti-Semitism, didn’t get a mention in the previous version. Now it’s on the list of just over a dozen forms of historic discrimination and persecution.

          Wow! What good news for the 6 million Jews killed in the Holocaust before and during World War II. They are at least recognized, but how many classrooms will see anything about this actually taught? Yes, a few classes are visited each year by Holocaust survivors telling their stories, but since most are in their late 80s and 90s, it’s questionable how long that can go on.

          Here are just a couple of the major weaknesses of the curriculum plan, which would form the background for making ethnic studies a graduation requirement for California public schools, as it recently became a requirement for any California State University diploma:

          The plan instructs teachers to deal mostly with the history of whatever ethnic group makes up the majority of their class. Since most public school students for the foreseeable future will be Latino, that mandates a lot of teaching about Hispanic history.

          Perhaps students will learn how smallpox brought to the New World by Spanish adventurers allowed Hernan Cortez to conquer the powerful Aztec and Maya civilizations in Mexico with a force that began with barely 200 men.  Perhaps they will be taught how some indigenous Mexicans turned against the Aztecs because of their brutality to those they had previously conquered.

          Maybe they’ll be taught about the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, in which Mexico ceded 55 percent of its prior territory to the United States after the Mexican-American War, including most of present-day Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado, Nevada and Utah. Maybe they’ll learn that some Mexican-American activists since the 1970s have pushed the concept of Aztlan, a mythical nation that would take former Mexican territory from America, and never mind who has lived there since the mid-1800s.

          It’s OK to teach about this, if done deftly and not as propaganda making students feel victimized. But it would not educate students about the other ethnic groups they will surely encounter while living in the world’s most diverse society. This state, after all, features native speakers of more than 80 languages.

          Another weakness: the curriculum still divides Californians into four basic groups, as demanded by the Critical Ethnic Studies Association, an academic group focusing on “colonialism and conquest, racial chattel slavery and white supremacist (doctrines).”

          These folks also dominated the design of last year’s rejected ethnic studies plan. It failed because rather than work toward racial harmony, it focused falsehoods, divisive issues and longstanding grudges.

          There was little concentration on achievements of any ethnic group, especially leaving out all positives about European colonists and other white immigrants who designed the country that became the most successful on Earth, both economically and, often, in living up to its democratic ideals.

          Ignore that history and students will get a warped education on what it means to be American, how the nation was shaped and how to get along with others who look different from them. Or as Williamson Evers, a visiting scholar at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, said, “They’re leaving out all kinds of ethnic groups…who had to work their way into success, and how they did it. There may be important lessons there.”

          It’s possible the new plan will get more revisions to make it fairer and more accurate, while accomplishing state Schools Supt. Tony Thurmond’s stated goal of promoting a “fairer, more just society.”

          But the plan doesn’t get near that yet, so it should be sent back for a second rewrite unless it’s improved considerably before next spring.       

         
-30-
    Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It" is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net