CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 2014, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 2014, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“PROBLEMS KEEPING THE HYDROGEN HIGHWAY
CLEAN”
Cleaner air, that’s the aim of about
$30 million in “hydrogen highway” grants given each year by the California
Energy Commission to companies that will build refueling stations for the
hydrogen fuel cell cars due to hit the road between now and 2017.
But the commission has had great
difficulty keeping its own grant-giving process clean. And trouble may be
cropping up again, as the commission gets set to pass out a new batch of
grants.
This
time, the problem could be a conflict of interest involving a former University
of California scientist who said in an online resume that (while consulting for
the commission) he “led the..effort…to
develop the …hydrogen station roadmap.” A new company co-founded by that
scientist, Dr. Tim Brown, apparently now seeks millions of grant dollars,
possibly using information he saw when working for the commission.
The recent history of this program
clearly implies that no one should be surprised at any ethical problems the
commission might blunder into.
Less
than two weeks after this column in 2012 exposed a pattern of favoritism and
cronyism in grant giving, the commission pulled back $28 million in awards it
had announced.
That
year, the tentative grants had gone only to station-builders approved by at
least one auto manufacturer and virtually all were earmarked for members of the
$87,000-per-year-dues California Fuel Cell Partnership, of which the commission
was also a paying member. As planned, millions of state dollars were to go
almost exclusively to billion-dollar corporations approved by other
billion-dollar companies. Non-partners could also apply, but with little chance
of success.
Energy commissioners changed their
rules, but much of the money – from vehicle license fees – ended up with the
same companies previously due to get it.
Then, last May, this column exposed
the fact that at least one grant handed out in 2013 went to a company proposing
to install hydrogen systems in a Beverly Hills gas station – even though the
station owner had not agreed to permit the installation.
Now there's Brown, until January a
senior scientist in the Advanced Power and Energy Program at the University of
California, Irvine. He left UCI to start and become president of a hydrogen
energy firm called First Element Fuel.
Reliable sources say First Element has
applied for well over $10 million in hydrogen station grants. The owner of one
service station near Marina del Rey confirms First Element contacted him
recently, trying to induce him to defect from a letter of intent he previously
signed as part of another company’s grant application. Sources say First
Element has also contacted other station owners already signed up by others.
The
Energy Commission stonewalls on all this, refusing to confirm or deny either that
Brown ever consulted for it or that First Element applied for grants. Nor will
it say whether Brown had access to other companies’ previous grant
applications. The commission refuses even to say whether it would be illegal
for one of its former consultants to profit from inside information. For sure,
that circumstance would at least convey the impression of corruption.
Tentative
new grant awards are to be announced on or before March 28.
“The Energy Commission does not
discuss applications during the screening and scoring process,” the agency said
in an emailed statement. “As part of its process, the Commission screens for
potential conflicts of interest and takes appropriate action to ensure the
integrity of the competitive process.”
But the commission’s record
demonstrates any efforts to ensure integrity have been incomplete at best.
Meanwhile, Brown did not return email
and telephone messages inquiring about his new company and how it came to try
to poach stations already signed up by another grant applicant. His resume
disappeared from First Element’s website after those attempts to reach him, but
printouts remain.
The overall picture is of an agency
which has had trouble administering a clean program, no matter what it says.
Maybe it will do better this time, for if it can’t run a clean program, how can
it help clean the state’s air?
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His
book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and
the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover
fourth edition. For more Elias columns, go to www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment