CALIFORNIA
FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“FRACKING: FIND AN INDISPUTABLY CLEAN METHOD”
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“FRACKING: FIND AN INDISPUTABLY CLEAN METHOD”
When a city like Carson, home to one
large oil refinery and next-door neighbor to another, hard by the junction of
two major freeways and site of both a Cal State campus and a Major League
Soccer stadium, slaps a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing because of
environmental questions, you know fracking of California’s vast oil and gas reserves
is no sure thing.
Carson’s current city fathers and
mothers, of course, were not around when most of those land-use decisions were
made, but they are essentially saying “basta,” Italian for enough. It’s one
thing to be oil-rich, as Carson is, and another to have unsafe drinking water,
which many in the city feel they’d get if Occidental Petroleum goes ahead with
a large fracking project in an oil field long considered mostly depleted.
Carson is not alone. Los Angeles,
another city with a long and storied history of oil drilling, is drafting an
anti-fracking ordinance. So are others.
This activity comes because
environmentalists don’t believe Gov. Jerry Brown and the state Legislature went
nearly far enough last year, when they okayed the nation’s toughest set of
fracking regulations.
The stakes in all this are enormously
high for all of California. The Monterey Shale geologic formation extending
almost 200 miles south from near San Juan Bautista to Bakersfield and Ventura,
and nearly 50 miles wide, is said by some to contain as much as two-third of
America’s petroleum reserves.
All this should make it a major public
priority to find a fracking method of unquestionable safety.
Oil, of course, has been drilled in
the Central Valley part of the Monterey Shale for more than a century. The Elk
Hills federal petroleum reserve near Taft is part of this history. Coalinga,
about 100 miles north, is home to the state’s most significant oil industry
museum, recognizing oil’s historic role in that area.
The oil drawn from those fields helped propel
companies like Union Oil, Occidental and Chevron to international significance,
but could be dwarfed by what lurks in underground shale.
Yet, the Central Valley’s long history
of soil subsidence and chemical pollution of once-fertile farmland provides a
cautionary note, even if a USC study last year concluded all-out fracking of
the Monterey Shale could produce hundreds of thousands of new jobs.
Environmentalists like to counter that
report with a 2012 study of several Pennsylvania counties where fracking is
common and has created few jobs. They also note a spate of small Ohio
earthquakes now linked by many to fracking. But there’s also North Dakota, once
a place of high unemployment and now a fracking boom state with the lowest
unemployment rate in America.
Until former Treasury Dept. official
Neel Kashkari and current Assemblyman Tim Donnelly emerged as the two apparent
Republican frontrunners to oppose Brown, it appeared he might be hurt by his
2013 fracking compromise. But now anti-frackers have nowhere else to turn other
than Brown. Donnelly evinces no interest in environmental issues, while
Kashkari advocates fracking the state to the hilt.
Doing that, he says, could produce up
to 2.8 million new jobs (far more than USC’s optimistic estimate) and $24.6
billion in new state and local tax revenues.
The best thing about the new state
fracking regulations may be that no one likes them. Environmentalists gripe the
rules didn’t stop the practice, while pro-fracking oil industry spokesman
Tupper Hull of the Western States Petroleum Assn. says, “We don’t like them.”
But where Hull went on to say, “We can
live with” the new rules, environmentalists don’t make that concession. They
worry that water pollution could occur even though oil companies must now apply
for permits before fracking and disclose where it will occur, two things
they’ve never done in 60 years of fracking, mostly in older oil wells.
The new rules aren’t permanent,
though. The state will report near the end of this year on what further
restrictions should be part of permanent rules, and the Democratic-dominated
Legislature will most likely okay them.
But there has to be a way to have at
least have half a loaf, perhaps by using careful limits on where fracking can
occur in order to do it without fouling ground water. That might allow enough
activity to ease the existing severe unemployment in areas most likely to be
fracked.
-30-
Elias is author of the current book “The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government's Campaign to Squelch It,” now available in an updated third edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com
Elias is author of the current book “The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government's Campaign to Squelch It,” now available in an updated third edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment