CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 18, 2014 OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“BROWN GETS NEW CHANCE TO MAKE OVER HIGH COURT”
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 18, 2014 OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“BROWN GETS NEW CHANCE TO MAKE OVER HIGH COURT”
For more than a decade, while
California has been among the most liberal of America’s “blue” states, its
highest court has been dominated by leftovers from two of its more conservative
governors.
That’s about to change, as two
retirements will soon let Gov. Jerry Brown change the entire tone of the
California Supreme Court, long a bastion of pro-business, anti-consumer
decisions and sometimes a brake on movements toward same-sex marriage, loose
regulation of marijuana and other social issues dear to activists on the left.
The first of the court’s old guard to
go was Justice Joyce L. Kennard, appointed in 1989 as the second term of Gov.
George Deukmejian wound down. Never a leader of the right, for a
quarter-century Kennard could usually be counted on as a pro-business vote in
almost every case. She resigned last spring and Brown has yet to name a
replacement.
Next to leave will be fellow
Deukmejian appointee Marvin R. Baxter, known for most of the past 20 years as
the California court’s most conservative member.
He resigned in late spring, effective
when his term ends next January.
With 2011 Brown appointee Godwin Liu
already the leading liberal in the state judiciary, this means that within six
months, California’s top court should feature three Brown choices, the most for
any governor since Deukmejian got to name six during his eight years in office.
Three Deukmejian appointments, however, came after he spearheaded a move to
vote three previous Brown-appointed justices off the court when their terms
came up for yes-or-no retention votes in 1986. Deukmejian claimed all –
especially former Chief Justice Rose Bird – were soft on crime.
The products of that Deukmejian move
are long gone, but the tough sentencing laws he pushed, with okays from
justices he appointed -- including one of his former law partners -- are a root
cause of today’s prison overcrowding crisis. Academic studies are inconclusive
on whether they also reduced violent crime.
Now Brown gets another chance. He
turned to Liu soon after returning to power in Sacramento, not long after Liu
was denied a slot on the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals because some
Republican U.S. senators objected to his academic writings excoriating the
records of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts. With a
moderately conservative majority on the California court, his influence has not
yet been strong.
That could change. Some legal experts
believe Liu, along with Brown’s new appointees, may quickly form a court
majority with the moderate Justice Kathryn Werdegar, the first of ex-Gov. Pete
Wilson’s two remaining state Supreme Court appointees.
This depends on two eventualities:
First, Brown has given no clue about who his next high court appointee will be.
There has been strong talk of a Hispanic appointee because Latinos have been
unrepresented on the court since Gray Davis appointee Carlos Moreno left in
2011, opening the way for Liu. Moreno is now ambassador to the tiny Central
America nation of Belize.
Among potential appointees are Thomas
Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican-American Legal Defense and
Education Fund, Stanford University law Prof. Mariano-Florentino Cuellar and
several federal judges appointed by President Obama.
The second eventuality, of course, is
that Brown would have to be reelected in November in order to choose Baxter’s
successor. Just now, that looks like a lock. Brown netted more than 54 percent
of the June primary election vote, and but for a misguided portion of the top
two primary law, the 2010 Proposition 14, he would already be reelected. But he
must run again this fall, against former banker and Treasury Department
executive Neel Kashkari, who drew just over 19 percent of the primary vote. All
Republican candidates in that open primary together took only about 35 percent
of the vote, barely topping their percentage of registered voters.
So chances are Brown will get another
crack at appointing a state Supreme Court justice next year. His choice will
more than likely come from the same list he’s considering for the current
vacancy.
The upshot will be a very different
court than California has seen since the early 1980s, the last time Brown had
something to say about it.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment