CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2017, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“LEFTIES WANT FEINSTEIN OUT: CLASSIC AGE DISCRIMINATION”
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2017, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“LEFTIES WANT FEINSTEIN OUT: CLASSIC AGE DISCRIMINATION”
None of the host of
ultra-liberal Democrats who would love to succeed her makes the direct argument
that at 84 – she’ll be one year older by next November’s election – fellow
Democrat Dianne Feinstein is too aged to be one of California’s two United
States senators.
But that’s what
they mean. “Feinstein … is no less alert and active today than she’s been in
recent years,” went one essay in California’s largest newspaper, damning her
with faint praise. “Generational renewal,” the same essay continued, is one way
to measure the strength of a political party. In other words, if you’re lucky
enough to acquire some age, get out of the younger folks’ way.
That’s, of course,
what those younger folks would like – until and unless they also eventually
acquire some years.
By all appearances,
Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee and
former chair of the Intelligence Committee, is at least as active now as she
was 20 years ago, when no one complained about her age. She wasn’t as loud as
some others (read: California’s other senator, Kamala Harris) in questioning
Donald Trump administration figures like Attorney General Jeff Sessions during
nationally televised hearings last spring, but her civilly-phrased questions
seemed more piercing to many. No Democrat has done more to preserve the
Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, which provides health insurance
for about 5 million previously uninsured Californians.
In short, Feinstein
has lately done as much as when she worked to thwart the conservative agenda of
ex-President George W. Bush 15 years ago.
But she’s still a
centrist, which galls a lot of leftists. She’s offered compromises on water
issues and won support from Central Valley farmers, while also fighting for
abortion rights and other civil liberties causes. She’s a firm conservationist,
the only senator actively opposing Trump appointees who seek to allow the
private Cadiz Inc. to tap federally-owned groundwater beneath the Mojave Desert
for profit.
She’s also been scrupulously fair to business.
And she’s been responsible for several measures keeping domestic surveillance
by intelligence agencies in check, while clamping down on those same agencies’
proclivity toward using torture.
All that and more
makes her able to work with Republicans and get them to listen to her reasoning
on some key issues. So, yes, she’s out of tune with more radically leftist
Democrats who would prefer a more ferocious, partisan approach.
But could any of
the current field of would-be Democratic senators – figures like Silicon Valley
Congressman Ro Khanna, who also used ageism in ousting longtime Rep. Mike
Honda, or state Senate President Kevin de Leon or Pasadena Congressman Adam
Schiff – be as effective?
Advocates urging
Feinstein not to run for a fifth full term would never cop to their obvious
prejudice against anyone her age. But they want her to leave now, following the
example of former colleague Barbara Boxer, who retired at 76 near the end of
2016, allowing Harris to succeed her.
Opportunistic
Democrats eagerly awaiting Feinstein’s departure will do nothing direct against
her, but all know that if she runs again, they can do little to prevent yet
more prospects from joining their corps long before her new term would be up.
No one knows who might become a viable candidate by 2024, or even whether
Democrats will still dominate in California.
Six years ago, Los
Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti was a little-known city councilman, Khanna held no
office, and virtually no one knew who Schiff was. Just as things changed for
them, the same could happen for unknown numbers of others over the span of a
new six-year Feinstein term.
Meanwhile, some
Democrats strongly wish for Feinstein to stay. Former San Diego Congresswoman
Lynn Schenk, for one, calls Feinstein “one of the most influential and
respected senators” and a “canny expert on legislation” who “probes for the
truth in her committees.”
That’s what most
people want in a senator, and as long as Feinstein provides it, her age should
be no factor at all.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His
book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and
the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover
fourth edition. For more Elias columns, go to www.californiafocus.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment