CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“THE SILLIEST STATE
SPLIT IDEA YET”
When it
comes to splitting California into two or more new states, silly season never
seems to end.
Since
1940, at least 27 efforts to alter this state’s boundaries or divide it into as
many as six new states have arisen and failed. The closest any came to success
was last spring’s effort by venture capitalist Tim Draper to create three
states from this one, which drew enough initiative petition signatures to
qualify for the November ballot, but was dumped by the state Supreme Court.
Draper
since has said he won’t try again soon, having failed twice in three years,
first with a “Six Californias” effort and then with his stillborn multi-million
dollar petition drive for three states.
But
that’s not ending the notion of making multiples out of California in a sort of
reversal of the national “E Pluribus Unum” (Latin for “From many, one”) motto
seen on coins from pennies on up.
Proponents
of the so-called “state of Jefferson,” including multiple counties in Northern
California and southern Oregon, have been making their pitch since the early
1940s, but have made little headway. This idea got its biggest boost after the
1960s “one person, one vote” decision of the U.S. Supreme Court deprived rural
counties of much of their previous representation in the state
Senate.
But the
silliest and most politically transparent effort yet is now up for its turn in
whatever spotlight gets thrown on state split ideas. This one is called “New
California,” and it has yet to draw definite boundaries, but its website (https://www.newcaliforniastate.com/)
makes clear that this may be the most politically motivated state split concept
ever.
For one
thing, while backers of the proposal haven’t yet drawn a definite map, they do
display a tentative one, giving “Old California” a strip of coastal counties
from Los Angeles north to Marin County, and veering inland from the San
Francisco Bay Area to Sacramento – essentially plopping the vast majority of
the state’s Democratic voters into one state and leaving the remainder of
California to go Republican.
The
political motivation becomes most clear in the 29 “grievances” the website
lists as causes for wanting to separate. “After years of over taxation,
regulation and mono party politics, the state of California and many of it’s
(sic) 58 counties have become ungovernable,” the backers say. They then cite
the often unreliable and sometimes alt-right website Breitbart News as saying
far more Californians move to other states than residents of other states move
here.
But
they say nothing about the likely motive for this smaller-than-reported
phenomenon: California homeowners cashing out on high real estate prices and
moving elsewhere to enjoy their often very large profits.
Further,
in Grievance No. 29, they say “The California communist government in
conjunction with the communist state executive instituted wherever the current
communist governor (Jerry Brown) has usurped power has created a reign of
terror on United States citizens living in California with the intent to secede
from the United States of America and thus destroy the very Union of states
which gives us our liberty and freedom.”
They
call all this a “betrayal by the sitting communist governor…”
Brown,
a wealthy landowner and rancher who plans to retire to his spread in Colusa
County, might be surprised to learn he’s that much of a pinko commie. Nor has
he usurped any power, having been elected four times as governor and once as
attorney general, all by large margins.
Which
makes the New California movement perhaps the most blatant bid yet to remove
parts of California from the Democratic political domination consistently
furthered by the state’s populous coastal counties.
The
clear hope of the backers is to get two Republican senators for their new state
and end a lot of environmental regulations. That might not be a guaranteed
outcome, though, as much of the putative New California – including Inland
Empire counties like Riverside and San Bernardino – are the state’s most
smog-plagued and benefit most from clear air rules.
All of which
makes New California look like a clumsier version of several earlier state
splitting efforts which went nowhere.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias
at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most
Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It,"
is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment