CALIFORNIA
FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2019, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2019, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“CALIFORNIA (MOSTLY) KEEPS ITS RETIREMENT
APPEAL”
All those folks who have been saying for
years that California housing and taxes are too expensive for most Americans to
move here, take note: The newest survey of Americans aged 45 or more, those who
can be expected to retire in the next two decades, show the Golden State has
lost little of its retirement allure.
To be sure, California ranks only fifth
among the 48 continental states as a desired retirement destination, but it’s
well ahead of Texas, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon and Washington, to name just a few
of the popular destinations for Californians cashing out their high-value homes
and moving.
The only states ahead of California as
desired retirement destinations are Florida, Arizona, Tennessee and South
Carolina, with Tennessee the only surprise on the list. Florida, the clear
leader as the preferred final home for 24 percent of those surveyed, has far
more retirement communities and other facilities catering specifically to
seniors than California. The allure of the other three states plainly is their
lower housing prices.
This
becomes clear from a look at the savings and other assets held by a stratified
random sample of 1,068 Americans over 45 sampled by the New York-based real
estate data firm PropertyShark.com.
The
firm, using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk tool, found that three of every five
persons in that age category possess less than $100,000 in savings and just 4
percent had more than $1 million available for use in retirement, covering real
estate and other expenses. It’s tough to contemplate buying California property
with that kind of asset base. So, most likely, California isn’t in the top two
in retirement desirability because most near- or middle-term retirees can’t buy
into this state’s market. More than one-third of the study’s respondents also
said they had experienced some difficulty meeting housing-related expenses in
the last year.
And yet, the study shows a significant 56
percent majority of middle-aged and older Americans want to stay put for the
rest of their lives. Aging in place, said PropertyShark, remains the gold standard.
That bodes well for California, the state
providing the single largest share of respondents. It means most older
Californians do not now plan to cash out and leave, despite the
siren call of far lower living expenses in nearby states like Arizona, Nevada
and Idaho.
Still, many seniors who would like to stay
put have felt a pinch. Among those with yearly incomes between $20,000 and
$40,000, fully 42 percent reported struggling with housing costs. There was no
breakout for California, but this state’s higher costs probably mean even more
seniors had difficulty here.
This
was one reason one-third of those surveyed said they’d consider sharing a home
like the women in the constantly rerunning Golden Girls TV comedy. About 40
percent of those 45 or over would consider sharing space with younger
housemates, with 35 percent preferring to share with folks about their own age.
The better-vetted a potential houseguest is and the more of a financial
contribution that person might make, the more popular the idea becomes. Simply
helping with chores would not do it in most cases, while being a family member
would increase the chance of acceptance for younger housemates.
Policy
makers need to consider these kinds of findings significantly as they plan
neighborhoods or begin to make the kind of densifying housing changes now being
pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and some state legislators.
Most
Americans in the over-45 category, the survey found, currently do not live in
neighborhoods they consider senior-friendly. But with Baby Boomers aged 52 to
74 now controlling about 70 percent of all disposable income and 60 percent of
those aged 65 or over living mortgage-free, more and more development will have
to cater to them if it’s to be profitable.
It
adds up to a picture where California is a favored place, just as it long has
been. These facts appear to contradict the pessimists about California that
former Gov. Jerry Brown used to call “declinists.” At the same time,
PropertyShark makes it clear life is not entirely simple for most of the
soon-to-be elderly in California or anywhere else.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visitwww.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment