CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, JANUARY 28,
2020, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“YOUR LOCAL
COLUMNIST: ENDANGERED BY AB5”
From
Madera to Mill Valley, Eureka to Encinitas, Coalinga to Claremont, local
columns are among the most popular features in newspapers that still survive in
this era of Craigslist and eBay taking away classified advertising and many
display ads moving to Google and Facebook.
But now
local columnists following in the large footsteps of the late icons Herb Caen
of San Francisco and Leon Emo of Madera are suddenly an endangered species.
Few
newspapers, especially weeklies, can afford to pay these writers regular
salaries for the valuable work they do in feeling out and revealing the pulse
of their own communities, and many of them have other jobs or sources of
income.
Now a
new state law best known as AB 5, authored by Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena
Gonzalez of San Diego threatens the very existence of this vital species,
without whose popular appeal some surviving newspapers might wither away.
Many
small papers also employ similarly-situated part-timers – day traders or
supermarket cashiers or medical assistants by day, reporters by night – to
cover city councils and local boards governing everything from water and sewers
to schools and building permits. Without them, these agencies might get little
or no coverage and many areas could become de facto news deserts.
Under
AB 5, newspapers now must make such almost-volunteer workers into full-time
employees if they are paid for more than 35 news articles or columns per year.
Never mind if the writers want this or not. Few small newspapers can afford to
do it; even many large dailies are cutting off freelancers for fear they might
be sued and found liable for huge legal fees and back pay.
All
this ties the fate of local columnists and other freelancers who are paid by
the piece to truckers and gig workers like the thousands of contract employees
at some of the same companies that now get advertising revenue which once
funded news coverage. This includes outfits like Google, for one, which pays
little or nothing to aggregate huge amounts of news that other people and
companies produce at great trouble and expense.
So far,
truckers have done the best in getting around AB 5, which was opposed during
last year’s legislative process by many of the very gig workers it supposedly
will protect, especially those who drive for rideshare services like Uber and
Lyft.
A
federal judge exempted independent truckers – many of whom own their own
vehicles and drive as contractors for shipping companies – from the new law, saying AB 5 conflicts with
a federal law that forbids states to make laws affecting prices, routes or service
of freight haulers. If those companies had to hire their current contract
drivers with full benefits, it would certainly affect shipping prices.
Freelancer writers have a pending lawsuit of their own.
Meanwhile,
Uber and Lyft are pushing a proposed November initiative to overturn the law.
These
moves have not stopped news outlets from moving to protect themselves from
possible lawsuits. The largest such action came from Vox Media, which announced
in mid-December it would cut ties with more than 200 California contract
writers and editors who covered sports for its blog network SB Nation.
Even a
large outfit like Vox, which also owns New York Magazine and blogs like Eater
and The Verge, can’t afford to give all its workers full benefits, so it has
dumped those in California and won’t say how it will replace the coverage they
provided.
If Vox
can’t afford to keep writers under AB 5, how can small-town weeklies be
expected to?
Gonzalez
and other AB 5 sponsors never say they intended to target freelance writers,
yet they wrote a very specific article limit into the law.
The
solution, if lawmakers want newspapers to survive, including some classic small
businesses with one editor-ad salesman-writer who needs help but cannot afford
to pay much for it, is to fix AB 5 with a new law exempting freelancers and
newspapers whose revenues don’t exceed a specific limit.
Anything
short of that ought to provoke a First Amendment lawsuit, for no California law
has ever threatened to curb freedom of the press more than this one.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at
tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising
Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now
available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment