CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2021 OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“THIS
RECALL SPURRED SOME FRESH IDEAS”
Until the
campaigning got serious in the recall election that unsuccessfully targeted
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, this state had not for years heard very many new
and creative ideas for solving its many problems.
But
suddenly during the recall, the air was full of them. Sure, the campaign season
saw a lot of old ideas rehashed, but there were also new thoughts.
On water
shortages, the usual bromide solution has long been “build more and higher
reservoirs and dams to capture more rainwater and snowfall runoff.” That idea
got plenty of airing during the campaign among the 46-person corps of wanna-be
replacement governors.
But there
was a new idea, too, this one coming from YouTube financial advisor Kevin
Paffrath of Ventura. Build a tunnel across most of America to bring Mississippi
River water to parched California. That, he said, could relieve the Midwest’s
frequent flooding while also slaking this state’s never-ending thirst.
Never
mind that the idea was quickly and legitimately laughed off because few of the
many states en route would agree to hosting a massive new pipeline tunnel,
while most states along the big river’s path would object to losing any of
their water.
Still, it
was a new idea, the first fresh thought in California water circles since the
late Los Angeles County Supervisor Kenneth Hahn campaigned in the 1970s for
towing calved icebergs here from Antarctica and then draining their melt into
the state’s water systems.
For sure,
both ideas are more inventive than merely enlarging reservoirs when there isn’t
enough water available to fill them at their present capacity.
Democrat Paffrath, who
finished second among replacement candidates, showed more moxie than other
hopefuls by crashing some of his rivals’ rallies. He also had other creative
ideas. Example: make non-violent criminals do unpaid public service work right
where they committed their crimes, like cleaning streets and painting over
graffiti. He also advocated paying students over 18 to finish high school and
attend college or trade school and proposed a two-week limit for granting new building
permits to developers willing to pay for an accelerated timetable.
And he
suggested tunneling under existing roads and freeways to create more capacity
and ease traffic.
These
might not all be practical ideas, but they were refreshingly original.
Most
Republican replacement hopefuls were far less inventive, but still expanded on
older ideas, like former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer pushing to clear much
more deadwood from forests to give wildfires less fuel. Never mind that this
interferes with natural forest life cycles. Faulconer also wanted to let
parents decide whether their children should repeat a school grade level
because of learning lost in remote teaching during the pandemic shutdowns and
he advocated holding utilities more responsible for damage from wildfires they
cause.
Celebrity
candidate Caitlyn Jenner advocated reviewing all state regulations and
eliminating any that have outlived their usefulness. This sounds good, and
ex-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tried it, but it did not fly, almost most
regulations remaining in force.
And Green
Party candidate Dan Kapelovitz advocated ranked choice voting, now used to
avoid runoff elections in local elections in Oakland and San Francisco. This
saves money and time, but produces weak, unpopular mayors in both cities. He
also advocated full personage status for animals, arguing that if court
decisions like Citizens United can give corporations such standing, why not
animals? Voters were left to wonder how animals might exercise their freedom of
speech.
Some
Republicans like Board of Equalization member Ted Gaines wanted to overturn the
2014 Proposition 47, which lowered many former felonies to misdemeanor status
with little or no punishment. But like any voter initiative, that law can be
overturned by another public vote, if that’s what the voters want.
Plenty of
candidates advocated more affordable housing, but none even mentioned the
obvious solution of converting the billions of square feet now idled in office
buildings whose former workers now operate from home.
It added
up to one of the most free-thinking campaigns California has seen, with far
more interesting ideas raised than in “normal” elections.
Maybe
some versions of these ideas would actually work. That possibility can be
tested in the regular elections coming up next June and November.
-30-
Elias is author of the current book “The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most
Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government's Campaign to Squelch It,” now
available in an updated third edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment