CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 5, 2024 OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“PRESSURE BUILDS FOR MORE OFFICE BUILDING
CONVERSIONS”
Almost no one wants office buildings
these days, either to build them or buy them.
In downtown San Francisco, the April
sale of an empty 16-story office structure on lower Market Street brought just
$6.5 million, less than the price paid for hundreds of California single family
homes last year. That was 90 percent below the $65 million price the same
building brought in 2016, the last time it changed owners.
In the Arts District of Los Angeles, a
fast-developing trendy area just east of downtown, plans to build a 10-story
office structure containing many “creative spaces” were cancelled a month later
by New York real estate developer Tishman Speyer.
It’s the same all over the country, from
Memphis to Maryland, from Manhattan to Market Street, where the commercial real
estate firm CBRE the other day issued a preliminary report showing office
vacancies in San Francisco at 36.6 percent, up about 1 percent from the
proportion of empty office space at the end of last year.
The vacancy rates are not quite so high
in cities like Fresno and San Diego. Yet. But empty or mostly vacant properties
nevertheless abound all over California and the nation.
Not even real estate investment trusts
(REITs) want to buy office towers anymore, with many trying to unload their
current stock.
It’s all because of the stay-home orders
issued at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, which sent millions of white
collar workers to new work spaces in their homes and allowed hundreds of
thousands to move to less expensive quarters far from city centers where they
formerly had to pay high rents because their presence was required in offices.
When some employers early this year
began requiring that workers return to offices at least part time, a wave of
resignations ensued. It turns out workers enjoy being at home, away from the
prying eyes and frequent demands of their bosses. This has also spurred new
fluidity in the job market.
That all creates huge financial pressure
for converting a major share of current office space into residential units. If
REITs can’t collect rents on their properties, but still must make payments for
them to banks and other lenders, they need to find another way to profit from
buildings they are stuck with.
So an office building conversion movement
– originally predicted in early 2020 by this column – is getting underway. But
it’s not yet going fast enough.
Billions of square feet of office space
now lie fallow and could be converted to apartments and condominiums of many
sizes and shapes. There can be low-priced units on the lower floors where
street noises are common and high-priced penthouses far above them, free of
most city noise pollution and enjoying sweeping views.
But so far, only hundreds of thousands
of square feet have been converted, leaving the vast majority of vacant space
unused while housing construction lags far behind the millions of square feet
state authorities say is needed.
After dragging their feet on this for
several years, Gov. Gavin Newsom and California legislators last year passed a
measure easing the path toward building permits to convert office towers. The
same for abandoned big box stores and their large parking lots.
Still, only about 5,200 dwelling units
were created via conversions last year in Los Angeles, and one-eighth as many
in San Francisco. The numbers were even smaller in places like Sacramento and
Oakland.
But this is a movement that is both
morally and financially necessary. Market-rate apartments in a converted office
building ought to sell for far less than units in a newly-constructed tower.
That’s because building and land acquisition costs are far lower for
conversions than new structures. Plus, there are fewer legal challenges for
conversions, which do not much change the profile and environmental effects of
existing buildings.
So expect a boom in conversions soon,
with numbers multiplying by at least ten over the next five years. It’s what
California needs and whatever this state needs, its people have generally
created over more than 170 years of statehood.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book,
"The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the
Government’s Campaign to Squelch It" is now available in a soft cover
fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment