CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2014, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2014, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“SOME NEW SCHOOL FUNDING PLANS GO AWRY”
Gov. Jerry Brown
and a lot of public school officials are just now rediscovering how right the
18th Century Scottish poet Robert Burns was when he observed that
“The best laid plans of mice and men oft’ go astray.”
The latest example
in California is the new public school funding formula Brown aggressively
pushed last year, one giving a greater portion of new money raised via the 2012
Proposition 30 tax increases to schools with the highest percentages of
English-learner students, foster children and pupils from poverty-ridden homes.
Essentially, Brown
wants to finish the job begun in 1971 by the Serrano v. Priest decision of the
state Supreme Court, which directs most funds from newly-approved property tax
levies to the poorest districts.
“Equal treatment
for children in unequal situations is not justice,” Brown said as he proposed
giving districts with high concentrations of needy children as much as $5,000
per year more than wealthier districts for each such student they have. The
grants would start lower and escalate over several years, the money added to the
state’s base grant of $6,800 per year per child.
Officials of many
better-heeled districts protested, suggesting the Brown proposal left out
students from poverty-level homes who attend their schools. They provided
numbers showing that districts in some generally well-to-do areas educate many
disadvantaged students, even if their numbers don’t come up to the levels
required to get the extra state money.
Those districts
pushed for giving schools money based on the actual number of disadvantaged
students they serve, rather than creating a threshold percentage schools must
pass before getting extra money.
Their objections
resulted in some change in the plan, with the extra money now being passed to
districts on the basis of numbers at individual schools, rather than
district-wide enrollments, an alteration made by the Legislature in June.
“Our disadvantaged
students deserve more resources to overcome the extra obstacles they face, and
this formula does just that,” said state Senate President Darrell Steinberg, a
Sacramento Democrat, after the changes were okayed. Known as the Local Control
Funding Formula, the new rules also give districts more control over how they
spend state money they receive.
That's the plan.
But it’s not working out quite as Brown and the school administrators hoped,
the same phenomenon Bobby Burns sagely noted more than 200 years ago.
Yes, districts are
getting extra money for low-income pupils, English-learners and foster
children. The initial boost comes to about $2,800 per student.
But many districts
are not getting all the money they expected because hundreds, perhaps thousands
of families have still not turned in verification forms attesting to their
income. So far, the state isn't handing over money for students whose forms are
not yet in, reasoning that without the forms, it can’t be sure the students
actually exist or are really needy.
Districts, meanwhile,
complain they already verify students’ family income every four years to
get federal funds for subsidized lunches, while the state demands new forms and
will want them every year. Doing it again costs them time and money, they
gripe.
For some of
California’s largest districts, this paperwork problem amounts to tens or
hundreds of millions of dollars. The Los Angeles Unified district, for example,
had only about 40 percent of the required forms returned as of mid-December,
with about $200 million at stake in the missing paperwork. In Fresno, hundreds of families were refusing
to fill out forms, possibly worried about immigration problems.
In San Diego, only
a small fraction of affected schools had turned in the forms by the same time.
If this problem
continues and the state is left with an undistributed pot of cash, it should be
divided among all schools on the basis of their federal lunch-money reports. Do
that and poor kids who go to school with the children of the wealthy will
benefit far more than they can under the current formula.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment