CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2015, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“EXPEDITE GAS EXPORTS; EXPEDITE PRICE HIKES AT HOME”
It
has been less than three months since Californians received their latest severe
lesson in the laws of supply and demand, unfairly applied. Gasoline prices,
which had dropped almost than $2 per gallon from their 2014 peaks, suddenly
spiked by more than a dollar when two refineries in the state had outages.
The
refineries are back online, but prices still have not returned to previous
levels.
Now switch the subject to natural gas,
where the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly last year for the LNG
Permitting Certainty and Transparency Act, which might better be called the
“Let’s Send Our Big New Supplies of Natural Gas Overseas Act.”
Many Congress members who less
than 10 years ago were loudly decrying America’s dependence on foreign oil
and natural gas voted for this bill, which gives the federal Energy Department
just 30 days to issue final decisions on natural gas exports after it accepts
final environmental impact statements on them.
The reason for this short-sighted
action was simple: money. Oil and gas exploration firms whose hydraulic
fracturing operations in places like Pennsylvania, Oklahoma and North Dakota
have produced an oversupply are tired of selling that gas cheaply to consumers
in states like California, where gas bills are significantly lower now than two
and three years ago.
They want to send much of the new
supply in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to places like Japan and
Europe for premium prices. So most of the LNG terminals built 10 to 15 years
ago as import facilities have been converted from turning sub-freezing LNG from
a liquid back to a gaseous form and are now are freezing gas to turn it into a
liquid, the opposite of what they were built for.
Terminals are being converted in
locales as diverse as Boston, Charleton, S.C. and along the Gulf Coast. Two
brand-new export terminals to handle gas from Wyoming and Colorado are in
process in Oregon, with another to come in British Columbia, Canada.
But because it fought off the LNG fad
of 10 years ago, when federal experts and academics like Mary Nichols (then a
UCLA professor and now head of the state Air Resources Board) were claiming
California absolutely needed hyper-expensive LNG imports, no export facilities
are in the cards here.
The votes cast by most California
representatives for the LNG export speedup bill, supported by both conservative
Republicans and the Obama Administration, were a serious disservice to their
constituents, even if they did assure campaign funds will keep flowing from oil
and gas interests.
It’s not that natural gas prices have
plunged quite as much as gasoline did in early 2014, but that’s mostly because
the wholesale cost of natural gas accounts for slightly less than half of what
consumers pay. The rest of the price comes from transportation and the cost of
maintaining pumps, storage facilities and pipelines, plus a profit percentage.
But double or triple the wholesale
price of natural gas – as will surely happen when exports start reducing
supplies – and California bills will go up again, probably back to the levels of
2008 and 2009 just for starters. For consumers and businesses, that will be
just like a large tax increase, as there are always severe penalties when
people and companies don’t pay their utility bills.
Since
no one calls this a tax, few pay much heed, but anyone who listens to
businesses relocating to other states knows that it’s not just high California
taxes pushing them. It’s also sky-high utility rates, okayed routinely by the
state Public Utilities Commission before its collusion with big utility
companies became widely known and proven by email correspondence.
This, then, is no simple matter.
There’s the need to preserve American energy supplies to assure the nation’s
independence from outfits like OPEC, the rapacious Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries. There’s also the danger from LNG, most recently seen in
last year's explosions of two LNG barges in Alabama. And there’s the pernicious
effect on both consumers and businesses when prices rise.
Put these together and it’s easy to see
LNG exports are as big a mistake now as LNG imports would have been in
California 10 years ago. But whoever said the politicians pushing this are
immune from huge errors?
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment