CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 2016, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 2016, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“LIGHT RAIL DOING FINE; NOT SO FOR BIGGER TRAINS”
A little more than one month from now,
the Metro Expo Line’s final portion will open for business, making it possible
to take trains from the far eastern portions of Los Angeles County to the
often-crowded beach in Santa Monica. This will come barely two months after a
new section of Metro’s Gold Line opened, allowing a simple, cheap 31-mile jaunt
from downtown Los Angeles to Azusa.
Meanwhile, in Sonoma and Marin
counties, test trains are running on another light rail line, between Santa
Rosa and San Rafael, with high hopes of relieving some of the heavy traffic on
parallel route U.S. 101.
Barely any protests have afflicted any
of these projects, which together will have cost many billions of dollars.
Meanwhile, protests are vocal and
persistent wherever the state’s High Speed Rail Authority plans to build bullet
train tracks, bridges or stations, even where it plans to share rights of
way with other trains, as on its planned course on the San Francisco Peninsula.
There’s also massive resistance to a
plan for running up to five freight trains weekly through the East Bay area and
Monterey County to a Phillips 66 oil refinery in Santa Maria, which supplies
much of the Central Coast.
These trains would bring crude
oil to the refinery, something Houston-based ConocoPhillips insists is needed
because of declines in production of California crude oil. Oil trains would run
from the Carquinez Strait near Benicia through much of the East Bay,
raising fears of derailments and hazardous waste problems in populous areas. So
far this year, there have been at least three derailments of oil trains in
other parts of the nation, with hundreds of temporary evacuations resulting.
Another train derailed only last month in the East Bay.
Loud as those protests are, they lack
the potency of the opposition to the plans of the High Speed Rail Authority,
headed by former Pacific Gas & Electric executive Dan Richard, who also
spent years as an aide to Gov. Jerry Brown.
The most prominent current anti-HSR
push is a proposed November ballot initiative sponsored by Republican state
Sen. Bob Huff of San Dimas and state Board of Equalization member George
Runner, which seeks to switch almost $10 billion in remaining, unsold, bonds
from the bullet train to water projects, including new reservoirs and
desalination plants.
That initiative, which appears likely
to make the ballot, is in large part the result of the High Speed Rail
Authority’s insistence on a route that makes no sense – meandering north from
Los Angeles through the Antelope Valley, then west through the Mojave Desert to
Bakersfield before turning north again for a run past and through farms and
towns in the Central Valley. When it’s done with all that, the bullet train’s
projected path would turn west again over the Pacheco Pass to Gilroy and then
veer north to San Jose before heading up the Peninsula along existing CalTrain
routes to San Francisco.
It’s a convoluted route that – if
built out – will add at least half an hour of travel time to a much simpler
route that was available: Heading almost straight north from the Bakersfield
area along the existing Interstate 5 right of way, where plenty of median land
is available for most of the run. Rather than cutting over the Pacheco Pass, it
would be far simpler to continue a little farther north to the windswept
Altamont Pass, where a turn west could quickly lead to a link with the Bay Area
Rapid Transit System and special BART express trains to San Francisco.
That route would cost untold billions
of dollars less and be far more direct and faster. But the illogical High Speed
Rail Authority opted for the least sensible, most costly route, inviting the
lawsuits and public outcries that have now set its timetable back by at least
three years. The Huff-Runner measure might just make it extinct.
The difference between the fates of
the light rail projects and this ultra-heavy rail couldn’t be clearer: Because
the light rail systems heeded where potential passengers want to go and chose
direct, non-controversial routes, they are being completed on time, or close.
Meanwhile, the bullet train and the
old train plans might just pay the price for making little or no sense and/or
wasting money: Extinction.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment