CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, APRIL 20, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“ONE CENSUS QUESTION COULD DO LONG-LASTING DAMAGE”
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, APRIL 20, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“ONE CENSUS QUESTION COULD DO LONG-LASTING DAMAGE”
President
Trump may just have struck his most effective and longest-lasting blow of a
seemingly constant conflict with California, the state that cost him a popular
vote victory in 2016 and continues to resist his policies most.
As with
many of Trump’s anti-California moves, like his abortive attempt to defund the
ongoing construction of an earthquake early warning system, he allowed one of
his cabinet members to announce the latest tactic: adding a citizenship
question to the 2020 U.S. Census questionnaire.
California
politicians and immigrant rights groups instantly recognized the move for what
it is, “an attempt to suppress the political influence of people of color,” in
the words of the Los Angeles-based Latino Victory Project.
State
Attorney General Xavier Becerra and the state’s top election official, Secretary
of State Alex Padilla, instantly filed a lawsuit to strike the question from
the Census, denouncing it as unconstitutional. Twelve other states quickly
followed.
But the
states will likely lose that legal battle. For the Constitution says nothing
about what questions the Census Bureau can ask, nor even about whether the
answers are confidential.
All it
says, in Section 2 of Article 1, is that every 10 years the government must
count “the whole number of free persons…excluding Indians not taxed.” The
information, it says, is then to be used for setting the number of
representatives for each state in the lower house of Congress.
But
census information now goes far beyond that. It also determines for the next
decade how much money each state gets for education, highways, homeland
security, health care, welfare, natural disaster preparation, sewers and much
more.
The more people live in your
state, the more money it gets for services Congress has decided everyone in
America should have. Citizenship
doesn’t matter in those distributions.
That’s
why, every 10 years for the last half-century, California has mounted a loud
campaign to convince illegal immigrants to let themselves be counted. For
neither federal funding nor apportionment of congressional seats is set by the
number of citizens in any state, only by the number of people living there.
In
short, the more fear the Trump administration can strike in California’s large
undocumented immigrant populace, the less money the state will get for a host
of vital functions.
That’s
because illegal immigrants have never completely trusted Census Bureau promises
that their information will be confidential and not passed along to immigration
authorities. Many fear being counted might lead to deportation, so they avoid
census takers.
They
have even less cause for trust today, when Trump’s Secretary of Commerce Wilbur
Ross controls the Census Bureau and didn’t promise confidentiality when he
announced the citizenship question for 2020. (A similar query was used in six
censuses before 1960, but obvious undercounts became common, so the question
was abandoned for the last five counts.)
But
Ross claimed the federal Voting Rights Act requires the government to tally
“citizens of voting age to protect minorities against discrimination.”
He can
likely revive the citizenship question because, as the Census Bureau says on
its website, “It is constitutional to include questions…beyond those concerning
a simple count…” The bureau then lists several major legal decisions, including
a 1999 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Census is “the
linchpin of the federal statistical system…collecting data on the
characteristics of individuals, households and housing units...”
It’s
hard to see how a citizenship question violates that decision, but Becerra says
it does. He adds, probably accurately, that the question is an “attempt by the
Trump administration to hijack the 2020 Census for political purposes,”
including diminishing both the federal money coming to California and its
representation in Congress. This state already gets back far less in federal
spending than it puts in the Treasury via taxes, and Republican politicians in
some other states are crowing that the citizenship question could cost
California as many as three congressional seats, plus three electoral votes.
This all
adds up to a savvy move by Trump to strike lasting harm against his political
nemesis California, harm that could far outlast his own time in office.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It" is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment