CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“ENDORSEMENT
TRUMPS BIG MONEY, GETS COX INTO RUNOFF”
Things
began looking desperate in early May for Antonio Villaraigosa’s campaign to
become the next governor of California, as one poll after another showed
Republican John Cox overtaking him for the second slot on the November ballot,
to run against current Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom.
One of
those surveys put his support as low as 9 percent, which would have classed him
as a second-tier candidate, quite a blow to the ego of any former mayor Los
Angeles.
This was quite a change for
Villaraigosa, who in a March interview displayed insouciant confidence that he
would win the six-way race for a spot opposite Newsom, who led every public
opinion poll in the primary race and easily won the most votes.
At that
time, Newsom led Villaraigosa in fund-raising by more than $12 million, while
Cox had just plunked 3 million of his own dollars into his campaign. Shortly
after, Cox’s advertising propelled him to a narrow edge over Villaraigosa.
Yet,
Villaraigosa was exuberant about his chances, several times repeating that “I
am ascendant!” By then, he likely knew that several charter school backers were
about to fund an independent expenditure committee backing him to the tune of
about $15 million.
But
then along came Donald Trump. The President may be the single least popular
political figure in California, where he spends a little time as possible, but
his influence among the 25 percent of the state’s voters who register
Republican is enormous.
From the moment Trump
pronounced Cox the man to “make California great again,” Cox moved well ahead
of his lone significant GOP rival, Orange County Assemblyman Travis Allen, who
had all along presented himself as a kind of surrogate Trump.
At the same time, Newsom began
saturating the state with television ads presenting Cox as a virtual Trump
clone. Newsom wanted to pick his fall opponent and he has. For Villaraigosa
never really had a chance at second place once counting of votes began. Never
mind that he and his supporters spent at least twice as much money as Cox, who
is now likely to draw much more support from other Republicans.
Newsom’s reasoning: If he got
Cox as an opponent, he would likely attract November support from virtually
everyone who voted in the primary for him, Villaraigosa, state Treasurer John
Chiang and former state schools Supt. Delaine Eastin (a total of more than 55
percent of all votes cast). But if Villaraigosa (or any other Democrat) were
his fall foe, those votes could splinter unpredictably. For Newsom, the easiest
path to the governor’s chair appeared to be getting a Republican opponent. His
ads attacked Cox as a Trumpist after the President’s endorsement essentially
doomed Allen’s effort.
Newsom
is well aware that no Republican not named Schwarzenegger has won a California
statewide election in almost two decades.
The donations to Villaraigosa
from big pro-charter school contributors like developer Eli Broad and Netflix
founder Reed Hastings were in a way a reward for Villaraigosa’s help getting
that movement started while he was state Assembly speaker in the 1990s.
Meanwhile, Newsom has long had
strong support from the California Teachers Assn., the union which often
opposes expansion of charters and the companies that run them.
The
primary outcome, with a first-place Newsom finish, may take the November
election focus away from the run for governor, where Newsom and Cox will differ
over almost everything. But the Democrats’ vast voter registration advantage
and Trump’s unpopularity with the full electorate removes most doubt about an
eventual Newsom win.
That
could place a bright spotlight on the fall race for the Senate between veteran
U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein and either fellow Democrat Kevin de Leon, the more
extremely liberal former president of the state Senate, or Republican political
neophyte James Bradley. Propositions will also deserve major attention,
covering subjects from gasoline taxes to the liability of paint makers for
damage done by lead in their past products to an attempt to divide California
into three states.
One
thing for sure: A single personality – Donald Trump – ended up trumping big
money and dominating a primary election scene where he wasn’t even a candidate.
30-
Elias is author of the current book
"The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the
Government's Campaign to Squelch It," now available in an updated second
edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment