CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 6, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 6, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“NEWSOM SHOULD HAVE NO TROUBLE FINDING MORE VOTES”
As
the primary election vote count drags on, not to reach a final tally until July
6, one large question confronts Gavin Newsom, winner of a plurality of the vote
in the preliminary round of this year’s run for governor:
Where
will he get another 17 percent of the vote, beyond the 34 percent he took in
that first round?
Even
though Newsom and his campaign staff glossed over this question all spring, now
it has become an urgent matter they must confront. For Newsom drew about 30
percent support in the first polls in the race, taken way back in the spring of
2017, and that’s not far from where he ended up on Election Night.
This
means that despite spending many millions of dollars on advertising, despite
his indefatigable campaigning in almost every corner of California, support for
the lieutenant governor and former San Francisco mayor did not increase beyond
its original base over the last 15 months.
One
striking aspect of the polling history in this election was that while more
than 40 percent of voters surveyed were undecided in the earliest phases of the
campaign, Newsom’s support did not swell greatly when those on-the-fence voters
eventually decided how to mark their ballots.
As
the primary vote neared this spring, Newsom tended to downplay this unpleasant
reality. “People who voted for other Democrats will eventually support me,” he
said in a May interview.
For
him to get the majority support he needs to win his two-man race against
Republican John Cox, Newsom must draw most voters who went for state Treasurer
John Chiang, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and former state
Schools Supt. Delaine Eastin in the primary. But those voters may still be
influenced by negative advertising used against Newsom during the spring,
mostly in May. For sure, Cox will air even more negative ads on Newsom this
fall.
Running
against Cox, an opponent of climate change mitigation best known previously for
trying to expand the state Legislature to12,000 members, Newsom must attract
Villaraigosa voters, Chiang voters, Eastin voters and a good proportion of the
25 percent of registered Californians who have no party preference. This may
not be as hard as it would have been to attract the same voters if he were now
opposed by Villaraigosa, the third-place primary finisher and a fellow
Democrat.
For
on almost every issue other than single-payer, the positions of Villaraigosa,
Chiang and Eastin were far closer to Newsom than Cox.
This
is precisely the scenario Newsom wished for as he ran myriad TV commercials
attacking Cox for being a virtual clone of President Trump, who sealed his
ballot slot when he endorsed Cox in mid-May. Essentially, Villaraigosa, Chiang
and Eastin voters – 24 percent of the primary total – have nowhere to go but
into Newsom’s camp.
Meanwhile, Cox’s
primary vote total closely approximated the GOP’s voter registration
percentage, meaning he got the vast majority of Republican votes and some from
independents, too. He’ll keep that support in November, but will have
difficulty winning over many who voted Democratic this spring.
While
there’s a chance some Chiang voters might end up in the Cox column, it’s
doubtful the primary leader will lose very many more Democrats or
liberal-leaning independents.
Meanwhile,
Republican voters who supported Cox’s tough anti-sanctuary immigration position
will likely turn out strongly for him and could influence other contests on the
ballot, including hotly contested congressional races and ballot proposition
fights.
Had
Villaraigosa survived the primary, things would have looked very different. He
might have splintered the Democrats’ fall vote in ways that Cox cannot.
So
the main hope for Cox and Republicans may be for many thousands of Democrats to
become complacent and not bother voting, since the November outcome looks like
a sure thing.
There’s a test
here for Newsom: Can he inspire Democrats to vote not only for him, but also
for the causes and fellow candidates he holds dear? We’ll know the answer Nov.
6.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment