CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, AUGUST 3, 2018 OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, AUGUST 3, 2018 OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“HUGE STATE QUESTION: HOW FAR TO GO TOWARD UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE?”
Nothing
frustrated California’s politically dominant liberal Democrats more this year
than having to live with the reality that their holy grail of single-payer
health care won’t happen here for years to come.
This is
in part because of fiscal realities – the cost would be enormous. It’s also
because of political reality. So long as Donald Trump is President, there’s
absolutely no chance the federal government will cede Medicare dues paid by
Californians to state government. Those dollars would be a key component in
paying for any state single-payer plan.
So
single-payer advocates have plumped since early spring for the next best thing:
Moving toward universal health insurance coverage via a massive increase in the
number of persons covered by Medi-Cal, the state’s version of the federal
Medicaid program providing health care to the poor and indigent, and including
as many as 250,000 undocumented immigrants.
Once
the primary election was over, they began pushing even harder. In fact, vastly
expanded government-supported or subsidized health insurance is a central part
of the platforms of several Democrats who qualified for ballot slots in the
November general election.
State
Sens. Ed Hernandez, running for lieutenant governor, and Ricardo Lara, seeking
the insurance commissioner’s post, are two.
So far,
the package of Medi-Cal plans has passed several legislative committees. Even
though the state’s new budget mostly leaves this area out, legislative
supporters said they would keep pressing it.
When
the bills passed a key state Assembly budget committee, Anthony Wright,
executive director of the Health Access California coalition of more than 50
statewide groups, called it “a major down payment toward the goal of a more
universal and affordable health system, in a way that can be advanced without
the need for federal approval. California has already made great strides…by
improving on the Affordable Care Act (better known as Obamacare), and these
actions would further fill the gaps that too many Californians fall through.”
As originally
written, the package would have expanded Medi-Cal to all income-eligible
under-26 young adults regardless of their immigration status. It aimed to
expand the pool of eligible senior citizens from those at 123 percent of the
federal poverty level to 138 percent. And it would provide a tax credit to
subsidize persons with between 400 percent and 600 percent of the official
federal poverty level income.
These
are standard liberal goals, with the exception of adding many thousands of
undocumented immigrants to the state’s publicly-funded health care.
For
many, doing this raises several red flags, so that part has for now not
survived. For one thing, there’s the question of whether it helps erase any
real difference between U.S. citizens in California and immigrants, legal or
illegal. If there’s little or no difference in rights and privileges, what’s to
motivate the undocumented to work toward becoming citizens?
This is
an era when non-citizens can already practice law here, work as election officials,
get drivers licenses and even vote in school board elections in one city, San
Francisco. The undocumented poor also may soon become eligible to get a state
earned income tax credit.
One
question this raises: how much should citizens subsidize undocumented persons
who have essentially sneaked into this country? At a time when millions of
Californians are struggling just to make their rent and mortgage payments, is
it right to spend hundreds of millions of their tax dollars on health care for
the undocumented?
It’s
difficult to quarrel with the need to educate and provide emergency health care
to undocumented persons who will likely stay in this country and state for many
years to come. Educating them helps create the well-prepared work force needed
to keep many businesses here and encourage new ones to come. And both simple
humanity and public health essentially demand that undocumented persons with
serious, often contagious, illnesses and injuries be cared for.
But
should they have full insurance coverage at public expense, including
prescriptions and even elective surgeries?
That’s
a moral issue which probably ought to be decided at the ballot box and not by
legislators subject to the blandishments of lobbyists and campaign donors.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment