CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 2021, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“AT LAST, NEWSOM ATTACKS A CAUSE OF
HOMELESSNESS”
Maybe it
was because of the constant harping by Republican candidates to replace Gov.
Gavin Newsom in the upcoming recall election. Or maybe he would have done it
anyway.
But
Newsom and the state government he heads are at long last moving to relieve one
of the major causes of the homelessness that plagues almost all parts of
California.
People
who canvass the homeless camps each year to get as accurate a count as possible
have long reported that mental illness is one of the problem’s most important causes.
Some semi-official estimates place the mentally ill component of the homeless
at about 20 percent. Others have it as high as 40 percent.
This is
not a new phenomenon: Since the capacity of many state mental hospitals was
reduced or eliminated by then-Gov. Ronald Reagan in the early 1970s, the
mentally ill often have had nowhere to live but in tents, cardboard boxes or
(for the lucky among them) covered pickup trucks or aged motor homes.
What is
new is that state government is about to throw significant money at mental
health. Sure, it’s a relatively minor part of Newsom’s $100 billion
big-spending pandemic recovery plan, also designed to help him fend off the
ongoing campaign to recall him.
But it’s
still a total of about $6 billion, nearly half what Newsom proposes to spend on
building new apartments and buying hotels and motels to create up to 46,000
homeless living units – if the targets are willing to participate. Half that
housing will come with counseling services, too. It remains to be seen how many
takers those programs will have.
Meanwhile,
if money can help solve problems, perhaps there will be a dent in the huge
mental illness difficulties that have plagued marginal Californians for
decades.
Newsom’s
plan includes $2.45 billion for new or renewed capacity in the public mental
health system, some of which was diverted long ago to other uses, including a
Cal State campus. It also includes $4 billion for behavioral health services
for children and youth. Plus $950 million for school-based programs and $430 million
for expansion of early psychosis treatment and youth drop-in wellness centers.
Whatever
its motivation, this is in part a response to a February Kaiser Family
Foundation poll reporting 40 percent of American adults say they suffer from
anxiety or depressive disorders, four times as many as reported before the
pandemic.
That
makes the expanded mental health spending a response to COVID-19 and its
accompanying isolated lifestyles in addition to homelessness. If there’s follow-though,
this level of new spending and activity can’t help reduce a serious cause of
problems that send many previously solid citizens into street living.
As might
be expected, mental health officials and therapists at all levels appear
thrilled at the new emphasis on their efforts.
“(This)
budget proposal shows our state understands how critical it is for us to invest
in behavioral health in order for California to fully recover from the…past
year and be prepared to meet the ongoing surge of need for mental
health…services,” said Veronica Kelley, president of the statewide County
Behavioral Health Directors Assn. and director of San Bernardino County’s
mental health department.
“Counties
will be able to build brick-and-mortar capacity, combined with workforce
investment, to address systemic gaps left by decades of underinvestment.”
Before
Newsom began traveling the state in mid-May to publicize his recovery plan
(also campaigning to keep his job), no one expected anything close to this level
of investment in mental health.
By
itself, it will not end homelessness, because mental illness is only one cause,
along with things like the lack of jobs for newly-released convicts, the fact
that some other states offer convicted “minor” criminals bus tickets here in
lieu of jail time and economic conditions that can drive people from homes they
can no longer afford.
But if at
least some of the current homeless or newly housed are willing to take
advantage of the new resources coming their way, there’s a chance the money can
reduce this seemingly intractable problem.
And if a
recall is what it takes to motivate politicians to attack problems at their
sources, maybe we should have them regularly.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, go to www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment