CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, AUGUST 31, 2021, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“HOW
NEWSOM GOT HIMSELF INTO THIS FINE MESS”
Gavin
Newsom might be asking himself these days, as Oliver Hardy first did in a 1930
film, how he got into this fine mess.
And
Newsom truly is in trouble: One sometimes-accurate public poll in early August
found voters favoring the firing of the governor by 11 percent, while most
other surveys have that question too close to call.
How Newsom got
here is really pretty simple. He made several very correct moves that some
folks detested. Then he followed with a bunch of smaller ones almost no one
could endorse.
The
movement to recall California’s Democratic governor, elected in 2018 by a
near-record 62 percent majority, really began in March 2020 with several vocal
protests near the shoreline in Huntington Beach, where longtime
anti-vaccination activists loudly objected to three mandates issued by the
state health department ultimately commanded by Newsom.
They
didn’t like being locked down, mostly confined to their homes. They hated
having to wear masks. And they despised the admonition to maintain social
distancing from anyone not in their own particular “pod” of everyday, almost
constant contacts.
Anger
began building even as those tactics most likely saved thousands of people from
coronavirus infections and death early in the pandemic.
Newsom
paid absolutely no attention to the protests. It was a sound public health move
to stick to his guns, and other governors who followed his precedents never
faced similar levels of anger. No one knows if Newsom could have defused some
of the fury if he’d faced down the protesting crowds and dealt personally with their
gripes. But his security team was said to have argued against that.
So
the anger festered, eventually morphing into recall petitions about to come to
a head in the fast-approaching Sept. 14 special election.
Failing
to meet with the anti-maskers/anti-vaxxers may have been the first Newsom
error. Of the others, perhaps the greatest was opting not to fight a court
order giving recall sponsors four months longer than usual to gather signatures.
Without that unprecedented extra time, Newsom likely would not face the ongoing
recall vote.
His
third big mistake may have been failing to heed advisors and others, including
this column, who warned that by going on television almost every day for many
months with the latest COVID-19 edicts and numbers, Newsom was converting
himself into the very face of the coronavirus he has fought to defeat. Soon to
be former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo made a similar public relations error.
Rather
than merely dealing with loose anger, many unhappy Californians made the
omnipresent, vastly overexposed Newsom the prime target for their feelings.
Then
there was his failure to deal effectively with bureaucratic delays and billions
of dollars worth of fraud at the state unemployment office. Many of the
hundreds of thousands of pandemic-induced unemployed blamed Newsom for their
sad financial condition, even though he worked hard for eviction moratoria and
offered plenty of free funds to pay their back rent.
These
were merely a few of the public policy and public relations errors guaranteed
to weaken any governor.
Then
came his personal errors, starting with last November’s infamous too-large and
too-inside dinner with lobbyists at the hyper-expensive French Laundry
restaurant in Northern California.
Months
later, after humiliating apologias galore about that, Newsom saw his son
photographed this summer maskless at a basketball camp while the state was
imposing a masking rule at all day camps. More charges of hypocrisy.
There
then followed Newsom’s arrogance in somehow convincing all other well-known
Democrats not to run as potential recall replacement candidates. Newsom and his
party figured that would make it him vs. a bunch of right-wing Republicans. But
celebrity candidate Larry Elder turned up in the GOP field, while a relatively
obscure blogger and registered Democrat named Kevin Paffrath suddenly made one
strong poll showing.
Newsom’s
response: He asked Democratic voters to simply vote no on the recall question
and ignore the field of replacement candidates. Essentially, he told voters to
give up one of their choices, an unprecedented request from a public official.
Talk about vote suppression…
The bottom line: It’s not all his fault, but Newsom bears copious
responsibility for his present predicament.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment