CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2024, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“POLITICIZING CENSUS:
THWARTED TRUMP AIM REAPPEARS IN PROJECT 2025”
There is no 2024 election
phenomenon from which former President Donald Trump has tried harder to
distance himself than Project 2025, an inch-plus thick manifesto from the
ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation written largely by former officials in
Trump’s 2017-21 administration.
“I haven’t read it. I
don’t want to read it, purposefully. I’m not going to read it,” he said during
his Sept. 10 debate with Vice President Kamala Harris.
But days later, he said of
the Heritage Foundation: “They’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans
for exactly what our movement will do…when the American people give us a
colossal mandate to save America.”
Every poll shows that when
voters hear what’s in Project 2025, the vast majority recoil, reason enough for
Trump to deny any link to it.
Among other things, the
manifesto advocates criminalizing abortion nationwide, increasing some taxes
and reducing Social Security and Medicare benefits.
But another provision, a
direct call to politicize the U.S. Census, will ring bells with many
Californians who remember Trump’s effort to do that in 2019, a move that could
have cost California many millions of dollars in federal funds.
The Constitution says that
every 10 years, the Census is to “enumerate” every person in this country, not
property owners or voters or citizens or any other category. Just live bodies.
The information is then used to divvy up seats in Congress and federal spending
in many categories, from grants to police to funding new sewers.
Trump was determined
during his administration to include a question on citizenship in the Census.
Doing that, said opponents, would likely cause many undocumented immigrants who
fear deportation to avoid being counted, even if it meant heading out the back
door while Census takers knocked on the front one. This threatened to cause a
drastic undercount of the undocumented, translating into significantly lower
federal support for many programs, from Medi-Cal to assistance for teaching
English learners in public schools. It also could have cost California a seat
in Congress, because this state hosts more undocumented immigrants than any
other, by far, and a severe undercount would show California population as far
lower than it is.
That would be fine with
Project 2025’s authors at the Heritage Foundation. One passage says, “A new
(Trump) administration should work to actively engage with conservative
groups…to promote response to the decennial Census.”
The idea, says Project
2025, would be to ensure that every conservative gets counted. It says nothing
about Native Americans, immigrants or low-income communities, groups that
reportedly often go undercounted.
So Trump’s supporters want
to use the next Census to promote their interests, and his. They call
themselves conservatives, while seeking to control what young women do with
their bodies and the most private of their decisions, the opposite of the small
government American conservatism has usually promoted.
For California, a positive
in all this is that the next Census will not be conducted until 2030, with new
congressional district lines effective in 2032. If Trump were elected next
month and leaves office as scheduled in January 2029, that would leave plenty
of time for a reversal of whatever changes he might attempt in the Census.
So this front in Trump’s
long campaign to punish Californians for voting against him heavily in 2016,
2020 and maybe in 2024, could at least be delayed and might be avoided
altogether despite what the Project 2025 blueprint says.
That would not stop him
from acting against California on other fronts, like attempting to eliminate
the state’s authority to regulate its smog levels and threatening (as recently
as this month) to cut emergency services after fires and floods.
Should Trump get elected
this fall and if his previously attempted plans to change the Census endure
until 2030, California could be a big loser, given that the funds at stake
cover government nutrition programs, public schools, highways, anti-pollution assistance
and much more.
That’s just some of what’s
at stake in the election that begins very soon.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at
tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough," is now
available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
Suggested pullout quote:
“This is one front in Trump’s long campaign to punish Californians for voting
against him heavily in 2016, 2020 and maybe in 2024.”
No comments:
Post a Comment