CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2025, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
"NERVOUS TIME FOR SOME HISPANICS AT MANY CALIFORNIA COLLEGES -- AND NOT
BECAUSE OF ICE”
As students
headed back to school at California’s more than 200 college and university
campuses, some had more reason than usual to be nervous.
For a federal
program that – for a change – is not currently threatened for defunding by
President Trump appears to be in trouble from a completely different source.
That’s the
Hispanic Serving Institutions (HIS) grants given annually since 1995 to
community colleges, four-year colleges and universities whose student bodies
are 25 percent or more Latino. These have totaled more than $600 million for
California campuses alone since the avent of the program.
With its huge
populace of immigrants of varying legal status, California has gotten more than
one-fourth of the money available under this plan, which lets campuses improve
their student support programs from faculty instruction on how best to boost
Hispanic students to added counseling for them, and student retention programs
that keep both Hispanics and others in school when they might otherwise drop
out.
Like Project
Head Start for much younger folks, this is one of the great successes
inaugurated or expanded during the Clinton Administration.
But the program
is now under fire, and its survival is threatened in a day when the Trump
administration has managed to eliminate many programs it labels as diversity,
equity and inclusion because they are designed to help minority groups move up.
For sure,
Hispanic students in California need some kind of help. Only 35 percent of all
students in the K-12 grades met or exceeded grade-level standards in math and
reading, with huge performance gaps between Latinos and Blacks at one end and
whites and Asians on the other. White and Asian students had gaps averaging
about 25 percentage points in performance on the California Assessment of
Student Performance and Progress during 2023-24, the last available full year
for which figures are available.
The obvious
need for something to lift up Hispanic students, who might otherwise be doomed
to second-class citizenship, does not matter to the folks opposed to the HSI
funding.
The current
opposition comes from the state of Tennessee and a group called Students for
Fair Admissions, which previously sued successfully forcing Harvard University
to end affirmative action admissions. It argues the rules for getting HSI
funding are as unconstitutional as favoring some racial groups over others in
admissions.
A current
federal lawsuit from Tennessee and the Fair Admissions group uses essentially
the same arguments employed against Harvard’s former affirmative action plan.
The main contention is that all colleges serving low-income students of any
ethnicity ought to be eligible for grants now available only to HSIs.
Of course, the
efforts for which the HSI funds are used at the 167 California schools that get
them are also supposed to benefit all students, not just Latinos. No one is
screening Asians out of counseling programs, for example, even if they are
designed specifically to meet Hispanic needs and not others.
Because the
lawsuit is pretty much in line with Trump administration goals and initiatives,
and because it names the federal Department of Education and Secretary Linda
McMahon as defendants, it’s uncertain the action will even be seriously
contested. The administration can simply concede and Tennessee and its
companion citizen group would win.
Those who favor
that outcome, according to the EdSource information service, consider the 25
percent-plus Latino enrollment benchmark illegal because it does not let other
institutions with lower Hispanic enrollments participate.
Right now, HSI
funds go to five of the nine University of California undergraduate campuses,
all but one of the California State University campuses and the majority of the
state’s community colleges.
Since the
lawsuit’s objective is not to eliminate the funds, but rather make them more
widely available, it’s possible most of those schools will still be able to
participate in whatever new programs HSI might morph into.
Still, it’s
unsettling for the faculty and counseling staff now using the money mostly to
serve Latinos, especially since no one knows whether campuses would put up some
of their other funds to keep these activities going if they are ruled illegal.
It’s also doubtful the Trump administration would do anything to uplift any
minority, considering how many of their campus actions now seem aimed to push
them down.
Elias is author of the current book The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government's Campaign to Squelch It, now available in an updated third edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment