CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 29, 2015, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“PUC DESCENDS INTO COMIC OPERA"
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 29, 2015, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“PUC DESCENDS INTO COMIC OPERA"
For many years, California’s powerful
Public Utilities Commission has conducted Kabuki-style dances with the
multi-billion-dollar corporations it regulates. But the latest significant
commission decision amounts to a descent into comic opera.
When the PUC deals with rate increase
requests from the likes of Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Southern California
Edison and the San Diego Gas & Electric Co., the Kabuki routine has gone
like this: The utility company proposes a rate hike far higher than it stands
any chance of getting; the PUC gives it something less than was asked, but
still guarantees the company large profits. The PUC then brags about how much
money it has saved consumers. But their monthly bills rise, and Californians
keep paying the highest power prices in the Lower 48 states.
This pattern has persisted for decades,
just like Japanese Kabuki troupes, whose dances involve complex plots – but
everyone involved knows just how they’ll turn out.
Now comes comic opera. This takes the
form of a $16.7 million fine against Edison for not reporting to the PUC on
secret meetings and communications between some of its executives and PUC
members in 2013 and 2014. Get this straight: Edison is penalized for not
reporting illicit meetings to the other participants in those meetings. As if
they didn’t already know.
It
is well documented that after the 2012 failure of the San Onofre Nuclear Power
Station (SONGS), former PUC President Michael Peevey met secretly with Edison
executives in March 2013 during a junket to Poland.
That
violated commission rules and state law while producing the outline of a
settlement announced by the PUC many months later. Unless changed, it will see
customers of Edison and SDG&E pay about 70 percent of the $4.7 billion cost
for decommissioning SONGS.
Yes, the PUC later held public
hearings and negotiated with consumer groups, but the eventual settlement
matched what Peevey jotted down on stationary and paper napkins in a Warsaw
hotel. Classic Kabuki.
Now the PUC, which so far refuses to
reopen the settlement proceedings despite the fact its terms were set in
illegal meetings, unanimously (with Commissioner Mike Florio abstaining) fines
Edison for not reporting secret meetings and other so-called ex-parte
communications with Peevey and other PUC officials. Ex-parte communications
occur when a judge or regulator meets one side in a proceeding outside the
presence of the other side.
The fine, said Commissioner Catherine
Sandoval, is intended as a “culture-changing remedy.” Whose culture? No one at
the PUC is being penalized, yet its people participated in every meeting
involved.
That’s one thing making this fine a
farce. Another is that the amount is minuscule, a flyspeck compared with the
total of $3.3 billion Edison and SDG&E stand to get in the settlement,
which stems from Edison installing key parts it knew could wreck SONGS, as they
did. Neither Edison, SDG&E nor the utilities commission has produced any
reason why consumers should foot any of the bill for that blunder. No
wonder Edison says it "disagrees" with the fine, but won't
appeal.
It’s also ludicrous to fine one party
in an against-the-rules secret meeting for not reporting that meeting to the
other people in the meeting. How can it change the PUC’s culture to act as if
it was unaware of meetings and emails involving its own president?
Equally absurd is the fact that
Melanie Darling, the PUC administrative law judge who proposed fining Edison,
communicated privately with at least one Edison executive during the settlement
process, asking at one point whether that agreement needed more work.
In accordance with the advice she got, the PUC so far refuses to reopen the
case.
The bottom line is that by fining
Edison, but not touching its own people or budget, the PUC is essentially
asking Californians to believe it didn’t know about meetings in which its
leadership participated.
The
PUC, of course, has done laughably disgraceful things in other cases, too, as
when it “fined” PG&E more than $1.6 billion over the multi-fatal 2010 San
Bruno gas pipeline explosion – except that PG&E will actually lose
less than half that amount.
All of which suggests it’s long past
time for more than mere culture change at this rogue agency. What’s actually
needed is a complete house-cleaning, or more inadvertent comedy will
surely ensue.
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment