CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“GAS TAX BOOST KEY TO TRUMP INFRASTRUCTURE CASH”
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2018, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“GAS TAX BOOST KEY TO TRUMP INFRASTRUCTURE CASH”
Strong
ironies are playing out today as California’s 14 Republican members of Congress
support President Trump’s announced $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan at the
same time they all back a planned ballot initiative to repeal the state’s new
gasoline and diesel fuel tax increase.
For
without the higher gas tax, California may see little or none of Trump’s
announced cash.
No
state needs more work on its infrastructure than this one, where more than
1,300 bridges of various sizes and shapes require seismic retrofitting and
potholes are common on every type of road from country lanes to major urban
freeways.
But if
the gas and diesel tax increase disappears, California will have little chance
of getting even close to its fair share of the purported new money.
That’s
because Trump’s announced $1.5 trillion actually amounts to less than 20
percent of that amount, about $200 billion in federal matching money to be
allocated over 10 years after Congress passes the plan, if it ever does. The
other 86 percent would come from state and local coffers. Because of high public
employee pension requirements and other higher-priority spending, not much cash
is likely to be on hand here when needed to match and catch the federal
dollars.
This
reality doesn’t faze Republicans trying to reverse the fuel tax increase,
amounting to 12 cents per gallon of gasoline and 20 cents for diesel. It also
raises vehicle license fees on virtually every car and truck in the state.
Those tax increases barely got through the Legislature last year and are the
reason for the current recall effort against Democratic state Sen. Josh Newman
of Fullerton, without whose vote the hikes would have failed.
Republicans,
especially current GOP California House members desperately clinging to their
seats, believe they need the fuel tax reversal measure to survive. That’s
because it now looks like they may not have a candidate on the November ballot
for either governor or the U.S. Senate, which could badly depress Republican
turnout just when at least seven GOP seats seem seriously threatened by strong anti-Trump
sentiment.
So
Bakersfield’s Kevin McCarthy, the House majority leader, put $100,000 of his
campaign funds into the drive to qualify the gas tax repeal for that same
November ballot. Devin Nunes of Tulare, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee,
kicked $50,000 into the campaign. Reps. Mimi Walters of Irvine and Ken Calvert
of Corona are in for $25,000 each, so far.
None of
them, meanwhile, opposes Trump’s plan, which likely wouldn’t do much for
California unless the gas tax stands.
Trump,
meanwhile, downplays the requirement for state and local taxpayers to provide
the vast majority of his infrastructure funding. “For too long,” he said,
“lawmakers have invested in infrastructure inefficiently, ignored critical
needs and allowed it to deteriorate.” His plan would change that, he claimed.
Responded
state Treasurer John Chiang, currently running third in every poll in the race
for governor, “This is a sham of a proposal that offers too little and asks too
much…Given the fact that California has at least $850 billion in public works
that must be built or repaired, the President’s $200 billion national
investment is no better than spit in the ocean.”
It’s
even worse than that if the new gas, diesel and vehicle license tax hikes disappear.
The 65 percent of those levies earmarked for highways alone will amount to more
than $3 billion per year. That’s not much compared to California’s current
needs, but it probably is enough to fix the state’s most urgent problems, when
combined with previous gas tax money and especially if it’s increased by 20
percent ($600 million yearly) with some of the Trump money.
So the
Republican House members pushing and helping fund the gas tax repeal effort are
essentially working against the interests of their constituents even as they
seek to motivate them to vote. This is nothing new for many of them: Most
backed Trump’s tax changes last fall even though some acknowledged those
so-called reforms would harm the majority of their constituents.
Knowingly
casting votes counter to the interests of their own districts, then, is nothing
new for these folks. The only real question is when they might do it again if
they’re reelected.
-30-
Elias is author of the current book “The Burzynski Breakthrough: The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government's Campaign to Squelch It,” now available in an updated third edition. His email address is tdelias@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment