CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2019, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2019, OR THEREAFTER
EDITORS: TO ENSURE TIMELINESS, DISREGARD EMBARGO DATE
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“TRUMP THREATS END; CALIFORNIANS MUST GET COUNTED”
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“TRUMP THREATS END; CALIFORNIANS MUST GET COUNTED”
The
Census ball is now very much in California’s court. It turns out, President
Trump’s bald effort to punish California for providing Hillary Clinton with her
2016 popular vote majority has been ended by a narrow 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court
decision in June tossing the issue of a citizenship question back to a lower
court that previously nixed it.
Trump
at first insisted he would defy the court and insert the question anyhow, but
pulled back this week, saying he will get all the citizenship information he
wants from other government sources. That, of course, is what Census Bureau
officials about one year ago advised him to do.
For
weeks after the Supreme Court ruled, Trump fostered doubt about what he would
do. But there’s no guesswork about what could happen if that query is included.
Since 1949, Census officials have said using the question widely would cause
vast undercounts of undocumented immigrants who don’t trust Census assurances
of confidentiality and fear deportation as a consequence of participating.
Trump’s minions
lied consistently throughout their legal appeals about why they wanted the
question in. They said it was to help the Justice Department enforce the Voting
Rights Act of 1965, which has never been enforced under Trump. New evidence
emerging since the lower court decision ruled the question out, in the form of
previously secret emails, plainly showed the motive for the question was
entirely political.
The
Supreme Court’s decision hinged on the obvious disgust of Chief Justice John
Roberts, a Republican appointee of ex-President George W. Bush, over lies told
by Trump’s secretary of commerce, Wilbur Ross. Roberts wrote that those
falsehoods demanded he cast a rare vote with the high court’s four-member
liberal minority, possibly deep-sixing the question.
Meanwhile,
the Constitution requires every human being in the country be counted, citizen
or not.
Ross insisted he
sought to insert the citizenship query used before 1950 because of the Justice
Department’s desire. The prior lack of Voting Rights Act enforcement made that
statement enough of a lie to offend Roberts.
There
was immediate speculation that Trump backed down on the question because
defying a Supreme Court order would almost automatically bring impeachment, and
might even be offensive enough for Senate Republicans to convict him. For sure,
it would have been a threat to constitutional government.
Trump had also
speculated about delaying the Census, contrary to law and precedent, but backed
off that, too.
All
this leaves any Census-driven parts of California’s future up to Californians.
If a citizenship question spurs millions of the undocumented to refuse
participation, this state could lose at least one seat in Congress, one or two
electoral votes in presidential elections and many billions of federal dollars
earmarked for housing, highways, sewers, public schools and much more.
But
now an undercount will only happen if Californians let it, as they did ten years
ago. Most Census experts believe low participation rates caused at least one
million to two million Californians not to be counted in the 2010 Census. A
repeat would make life more difficult and less consequential for many
Californians.
So
Californians, whether citizens or not, must step up now and protect their own
interests. Anticipating something like today’s scene, ex-Gov. Jerry Brown and
state legislators last year allocated $90.3 million for Census information and
outreach.
That’s
about $3 for every California resident, which the state will spend encouraging
participation and discouraging anyone who’s thinking of hiding from federal
Census takers. Brown and his allies considered spending $90-plus million on TV
and newspaper ads, social media and community meetings a prudent investment
that promises to produce far more in new money than it costs.
The
effort is needed because, even without the decrements brought by a Census
undercount, Trump already allots an average of about 6 billion less federal
dollars each year to California than it got under ex-President Barack Obama.
The
one way to change this kind of steady mistreatment, minimization and
denigration of California while Trump holds office is to maximize the state’s
Census count. That will only happen if virtually all Californians participate.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment