CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2019, OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2019, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“SOME CALIFORNIA DISASTERS THAT MAY BE WAITING TO HAPPEN”
Virtually
all adult Californians know the kinds of disasters that commonly befall this
state by the time they decide to stay here or move to the Golden State from
someplace else.
The
usual list most folks consider is fairly short, but can have long-lasting
impacts: fires, floods and earthquakes. Those who lack complete faith in
technology and human efforts to prevent tragedy see some other potential
dangers lurking.
One
is the nuclear waste dump that has taken shape beside the defunct San Onofre
Nuclear Generating Station near the border between San Diego and Orange
counties.
About
15 months ago, the Southern California Edison Co., operator and majority owner
of the onetime atomic power plant, saw a 50-ton (100,000-pound) canister with a
five-eighths-inch-thick shell twist almost completely out of control while
being loaded into a niche in the newly-constructed beachfront nuclear waste
dump Edison has built because there is no room in existing federal atomic dumps
and no immediate prospect of opening a new one.
Like
other nuclear plant operators, Edison must fend for itself both in building and
filling its dump. The near-mishap, which could have seen the giant, thin-walled
canister fall dozens of feet to a hard concrete floor, was neither reported nor
acknowledged publicly by Edison until months later, when a worker mentioned it
during a public meeting nearby.
Because
this almost-accident took time to clear and workers plainly needed more
instruction and practice in handling the canisters, no more radioactive waste
was loaded into the dump – just yards from a popular state beach – until
slightly over a year had passed.
Edison
maintains everything there is now hunky-dory, even though a major leak from the
dump could theoretically irradiate everything within 50 miles, including most
of Orange and San Diego counties, plus one of America’s two largest Marine
Corps bases, Camp Pendleton.
The
near-accident “will not repeat itself,” Edison has said. A spokesman told a
reporter, “What issues we did see were captured as part of our lessons-learned,
continuous education program. That will help us be successful going forward.”
No
one is panicking in surrounding areas. But some consumer activists still worry,
especially after a webinar in which the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission
admitted it has no backup plan for repairing or safely storing any damaged
nuclear waste container. The best way to remove leaking containers is via “hot
cells,” portable nuclear containment chambers. But there are no hot cells
within 1,000 miles large enough to cope with San Onofre’s storage units and
federal law forbids moving high-level nuclear waste across state lines – or
even across freeways like the adjacent I-5.
Said
Charles Langley, executive director of the San Diego-based advocacy group
Public Watchdogs, “The admission by the NRC that it has no backup plan for
handling leaks in these thin containers at San Onofre is terrifying.” He also
worries about what a significant earthquake on the known fault offshore from
San Onofre might do to the canisters and their storage facility.
Only
about 45 miles northwest along the coast, other folks worry about another fault
and another kind of potential disaster.
A
homeowner group in San Pedro, beside the Los Angeles Harbor, which is America’s
busiest, worries about the effects of a possible earthquake on the previously
unpublicized, blind-thrust Wilmington fault which seismologists only recently
rated as active. The fault runs near several oil refineries, but the homeowners
group worries it might set off an explosion from a 25-million-gallon liquified
petroleum gas storage tank federally authorized under then-President Richard
Nixon during the early 1970s.
The
group says this large tank was built without Los Angeles permits and sits on
soils which the U.S. Geological Survey defines as prone to “landslides and
liquefaction.” A quake under this alleged geological feature could be
disastrous, the homeowners fear.
And
yet… life proceeds quite normally for residents who could be affected by either
of the potential disasters at the doorsteps of San Diego, Los Angeles and their
suburbs. Real estate prices have risen exponentially over the last four decades
in both areas, while no one has seriously discussed possible effects on schools
and other public facilities.
Is
much of California living in a fool’s paradise?
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias
columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment