CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JANUARY 3, 2020 OR THEREAFTER
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JANUARY 3, 2020 OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“TRUMP ADMINISTRATION THREATENS A CALIFORNIA GOOD NEWS STORY”
After
a year of massive fires and floods, electricity blackouts, utility rate
increases and gasoline price gouging, California at last has a good news story
to enjoy: The state’s teenage birth rate has reached a new modern-era low.
But
wait – that good news is threatened by the Donald Trump administration, which
seeks to cut back Title X money that funds things like vans giving girls rides
to community health centers where they can get birth control supplies,
pregnancy testing and tests for sexually transmitted diseases.
This
is now the subject of one in the long series of lawsuits California is fighting
in order to preserve programs that keep the standard of living here high and
pollution lower than it’s been in many decades.
Beyond
the issue of why Trump and his minions would want to cut this funding –
anti-abortion and birth control ideology is the likeliest reason – is the
unanswered question of why this incarnation of the federal government would
want to cut programs that reduce welfare and promote education of young
persons.
In
the face of political machinations, it may be constructive to delve into the
reasons why birth rates are down among junior high and high school students.
And
they have dropped considerably over the last few years. With just under 14 live
births for every 1,000 females aged 15 to 19 in 2018, California is now well
below the national average of 19 births per 1,000 females in that age range.
Arkansas is highest with 33; Massachusetts lowest at just eight.
These
figures mean there is still room for plenty of improvement here. That’s
especially true in certain counties: Kern County, for example, had 32 live
births per 1,000 young women, more than double the statewide rate. Marin County
was lowest at six.
Both
the national figures and those for California counties show strong correlation
between low teenage birth rates and the wealth and education levels of adults.
Massachusetts has the highest proportion of college-educated persons in America
and Marin among the highest education rates for California counties. Both
places also rank high in economic terms.
But
more than increased prosperity and education has lowered the California
numbers. Government and private programs also have helped enormously.
The
state’s Family Planning, Access, Care and Treatment program provides free
contraceptives and counseling to young people and is available at more than
2,000 locations statewide, including all University of California and Cal State
University campus health centers.
The
emphasis on contraception also reduced abortions even as California’s teen
birth rate declined.
Abortions
in 2018 were performed on 16 women out of every 1,000 in the 15-44 age range, a
drop of about 15 percent over the last five years.
This
demonstrates that pro-life lobbyists who advocate against both abortions and
making contraceptives widely-available are contradicting themselves. The better
and the more widespread the contraceptive program, the fewer abortions in any
state or area.
And
contraceptives are very widely-used by California youths. The federal Centers
of Disease Control reported that more than half of all sexually active high
school students in the state say they used a condom the last time they had sex.
An overlapping 30 percent said they relied on birth control pills and other
non-condom methods in their most recent sexual experience.
Then
there was the failure of several statewide ballot measures that required
parental consent for abortions. Because such consent remains optional for
teenage girls, they can and often do seek counseling in large numbers. They
might be inhibited if counselors were required to inform parents.
This
all amounts to a vastly under-publicized good news story. For federal
statistics over the last 10 years show that almost half of all teenage mothers
leave school for at least a few years after giving birth. Those who don’t drop
out must combine motherhood with studies and whatever jobs they hold, often
crimping academic progress.
This
deprives many young women of college educations and lowers their potential for
professional and financial success, often for the rest of their lives.
The
fact that fewer and fewer young women are now exposed to such hardships is a
good news story of large proportions and one of which California can feel justifiably
proud.
-30-
Email
Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough,
The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch
It," is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns,
visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment