CALIFORNIA FOCUS
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2017, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“WILL NEXT GOVERNOR END STATE CORRUPTION?”
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2017, OR THEREAFTER
BY THOMAS D. ELIAS
“WILL NEXT GOVERNOR END STATE CORRUPTION?”
The
well-documented corruption in various wings of California state government
shows few signs of abating soon:
Even
though Gov. Jerry Brown’s latest questionable appointees to the state’s
powerful Public Utilities Commission have been held up, no one has yet been
penalized for several fix-is-in decisions there that are costing consumers
billions of dollars.
Energy
Commission members who handed out many millions of dollars in hydrogen highway
grants to cronies with conflicts of interest weren’t punished; they were
reappointed.
Nothing
happened to University of California President Janet Napolitano and her aides
who accumulated a $175 million slush fund while students were assessed about
that same amount in tuition increases.
And
so on.
Ask
any of the three candidates now leading the polls in the run for governor about
all this and you get encomiums to Brown and blanket vows to end corruption, but
nothing specific and no sign that any of them understands the extent of
sleaziness in state agencies.
Said
Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a former San Francisco mayor who has led the polls since
the run to replace Brown began, “I will not be known for being timid about this
or anything else. Gov. Brown says reform is overrated; I say it’s underrated.”
Former
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, running second, noted that “As mayor,
my very first executive direction was that city commissioners could not raise
money for me or for city council members. Historically, it’s been the opposite.
“I
believe transparency in government is critical, especially in a time when
people don’t trust the government, any government.”
Noting
that members of the state PUC cannot be fired during their six-year terms, even
by the governor who appointed them, Villaraigosa added that “We should look at
the ability of the governor to fire PUC members. I had zero tolerance for
corruption on any city commission and that’s how I would be in state
government, too.”
And
state Treasurer John Chiang, a former state controller best known for
withholding pay from state legislators when they were late approving a budget,
said, “The governor needs to set the high ground on matters of government
integrity. We need to hold people accountable. When I’m governor and we find
instances of corruption, people will get due process, but they will be
responsible for what they and their agencies do.”
Chiang,
however, noted that a mere accusation of corruption doesn’t mean it occurred.
He had some recent experience in this area, when the Sacramento Bee in August
reported that a panel he chairs called the California Tax Credit Allocation
Committee gave credits and funding to affordable housing builders who
contributed to his campaign fund. That committee also includes state Controller
Betty Yee and the state finance director, appointed by Brown.
“That
was untrue and utterly irresponsible (by the Bee),” Chiang declared. “It was
sloppy journalism. Every credit approved during my two-and-a-half years on the
committee has been based on a mathematical formula, with professional staff
scoring this based on amenities and other features (of the planned housing).
The three-members followed staff recommendations in every single case. No one
deviated from the formula. I’ve worked hard to keep things completely fair.”
But
none of these candidates spoke specifically about any of the known cases of
corruption in state government, nor did any of them commit to trying to ferret
out more.
If
they can’t or won’t be specific about making fixes while they’re mere
candidates, it’s anyone’s guess how they might behave if and when they take
office.
What’s
clear is that the current corruption takes many forms, but does not often see
state employees directly line their pockets. Yet, there are plenty of
revolving-door examples, where regulators later go to work for the companies
they’ve helped. There are also instances of cronies influencing state
officials, as when former Gov. Gray Davis, a onetime Brown chief of staff,
lobbied Brown to grant hydraulic fracking permits to his client, the Occidental
Petroleum Corp., and those permits were granted after officials who originally
sought to deny them were fired.
So
here’s one question each candidate for governor should be asked when debates
begin before next June’s primary election: Exactly what will you do to change
the climate of corruption that’s persisted for many years under several
governors?
-30-
Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@aol.com. His book, "The Burzynski Breakthrough, The Most Promising Cancer Treatment and the Government’s Campaign to Squelch It" is now available in a soft cover fourth edition. For more Elias columns, visit www.californiafocus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment